[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Community vs. Licensing
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Wed Sep 1 08:30:32 BST 2010
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 16:04, Jane Smith <janesmithosm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> John Smith and I know the Truth. Frederik's books should be burnt. He is an
>> Apostle of the 'new license'.
>
> I would have said apostle of the CT because I highly doubt he'll be
> content with the license...
Thank you both for being so concerned about my personal license
preference. Contrary to what John seems to believe, I would be quite
content with the new license - not exactly "in love with it", but
"content" is a good word I think. - As for the contributor terms, some
parts of them are necessary and some are not necessary but prudent,
among them the much-discussed clause 3; only the most presumptuous
person would believe that a license they choose today will automatically
be the best license for the project for all time.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list