[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Community vs. Licensing

[Andy Allan]

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:43 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 19:38, Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please, stop being so childish about all this. Most people would be
>> mortified if they realised how much trouble they were causing, even
>> inadvertently. Whereas you seem to be relishing it, and egging
>> yourself on to annoy everyone even more. It's really unbecoming.
>
> I'm mortified about the license change debate, I'm mortified that any
> grievances with the license change debate go un-addressed, I'm
> mortified that people feel that have to resort to muck racking to try
> and win a debate.

My comments have nothing to do with the "debate" or any issues you
have with the licensing (and exactly how one would "win" or "lose"
such a discussion is beyond me, but some people don't seem to want for
the lack of trying).

My comments are intended to address your disruptive behaviour on the
wiki, in the database, and elsewhere. But you seem to relish the
disruption and are continually "Unconcerned about the adverse
consequences for others of one's actions". But instead of apologising,
or even acknowledging that you seemingly can't behave cooperatively
within the OSM community, you carry on with your destructive
behaviour. I find that quite unfortunate.

Thanks,
Andy