[OSM-legal-talk] Noise vs unanswered questions

Anthony osm at inbox.org
Thu Sep 2 03:10:07 BST 2010


On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> Also proceeding is the discussion of exactly what edits should be
> treated in what way during the license change[1].  So if you care one
> way or the other if a spell-check 'bot that changes tag spelling
> should be considered for reversion if the owner chooses not to accept
> ODbL/CT, you should participate in that discussion.

Who's going to make the decision?  After the decision is made, will
there be a vote?  Will it be run past the OSMF lawyers, and if so,
when?



More information about the legal-talk mailing list