[OSM-legal-talk] Noise vs unanswered questions

[Simon Ward]

On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:59:19AM -0600, SteveC wrote:
> Did you read the minutes where all the CT issues are being discussed?

Yes, hence why I said this (highlighting added):

> > I don’t see much compromise happening from OSMF on the contributor
> > terms.  *There is a very small amount*, but OSMF seems to want to stick as
> > close to what they have, with no chance of what they consider a
> > significant change.

There are two major contributions to my feelings on this: The minutes,
and Mike Collinson’s very welcome update, where he says:

    “We are not at this point looking to making any major changes to
    the way the Contributor Terms, but of course cannot completely rule
    that out.”

Ok, I should have said “little chance” instead of “no chance”, but I
hope you will forgive me for feeling weary about it all.

Simon
-- 
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20100904/175751f3/attachment.pgp>