[OSM-legal-talk] Garmin Maps / Produced Works
aighes
h.scholland at googlemail.com
Sun Sep 5 20:36:19 BST 2010
Rob Myers wrote:
>
>> There is so much ambiguity about 'produced works' and 'derived databases'
>> that it
>> would be far better for the licence to state some example cases directly,
>> rather
>> than require clarifications hosted on the OSM wiki pages (!).
>
> They are novel concepts so good examples will help people to understand
> them, yes. These should be on the wiki rather than in the licence,
> though. Licences don't usually get to interpret themselves. :-)
>
Hello
I think these examples should be in the licens or in an appendix of the
licens. A wiki-page or a website could changed everytime. So today, a
garminmap will be an produced work and tomorrow it could be a database and
so on. This is arbitrariness and no company or free project can be sure, if
there offer is legal.
Best regards,
aighes
--
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Garmin-Maps-Produced-Works-tp5496944p5501135.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list