[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

[John Smith]

On 17 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> If you mean the licence of OSM, that would clash with section 4 of the CTs.

In that case, Section 3 clashes with 4, since there is no minimum
requirement of attribution.

> If you mean a produced work, that would clash with section 4.3 of the ODbL.

So then OS data isn't compatible with ODBL?