[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

[Markus]

Isn't section 4 there so if the licence is changed in the future (section 3)
that attribution is needed in a future licence.

Markus_g

-----Original Message-----
From: legal-talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org
[mailto:legal-talk-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of John Smith
Sent: Friday, 17 September 2010 6:11 AM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

On 17 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> If you mean the licence of OSM, that would clash with section 4 of the
CTs.

In that case, Section 3 clashes with 4, since there is no minimum
requirement of attribution.

> If you mean a produced work, that would clash with section 4.3 of the
ODbL.

So then OS data isn't compatible with ODBL?

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk