[OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license

[Grant Slater]

On 17 September 2010 11:26, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:

>> With this response b) was seen as compatible. Under a) it was advised
>> there is an issue of sub-licensing. Asking source author for
>> permission to contribute under CT was an option; as was to keep
>> distributing said specific data under license. Item b) is still open
>> AFAIK.
>
> If b) is compatible, could you clarify what you mean by it still being open?
>

Yes, it was late, made a mistake. I meant a) CC-BY is still open and
not yet resolved.

Regards
 Grant