[OSM-legal-talk] definitions of "free" and "open"
fjmd1a at gmail.com
Mon Apr 11 08:04:48 BST 2011
2011/4/11 Krysha Krysha <krysha at rambler.ru>:
> Why in the Contributor Terms does not contain definitions of "free" and
> "open". Different organizations may have different understanding of these
> terms. For example, there is a Microsoft Open License ... The absence of
> these definitions stops me from taking those Contributor Terms.
I think the idea is that it will be up to contributors to decide
whether a licence is "free" and "open" rather than leaving it to
lawyers to do so.
More information about the legal-talk