[OSM-legal-talk] A case for CT + CC-BY-SA

[phobie]

I suggest to mark all CC-BY-SA-only objects with a licence-tag instead
of deleting them automatically!
Start offering zwo plant dumps, one CC-BY-SA-only and one ODbL-only,
and than let the users decide which they want to use!

We should only start thinking about removing the CC-BY-SA-only licenced
export after both dumps contain identical data or
someone really successfully abuses problems of the CC-BY-SA licence!

Doing a massive data deletion of all non-ODbL data is just destructive
and useless.
Especially because nothing forces us to do so!
Non-ODbL data will vanish over time by itself.

Regards
phobie


On 23.07.2011 18:11, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> In a nutshell:
> The Contributor Terms give the OSMF the right to publish OSM data under
> the terms of the CC-BY-SA. I suggest that the OSMF should use that
> right, and *continue to publish the OSM database under CC-BY-SA* after
> the end of the license change process.