[OSM-legal-talk] I want my access back
simon at poole.ch
Wed Aug 10 10:43:11 BST 2011
Am 10.08.2011 11:29, schrieb Nic Roets:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:50 AM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
> Gremmen<g.gremmen at cetest.nl> wrote:
>> PD data does not need a
>> complicated and binding CT as the current one.
> True. But PD is "forward" compatible with the CTs. For example, we did
> not need to ask the upstream authors of TIGER to accept the CTs.
That is naturally the case because we have a well known source and
to be very sure that the data is actually really PD in the case of the
In the case of an individual mappers contribution we have a very
where essentially we would need the same level of agreement as the
More information about the legal-talk