[OSM-legal-talk] I want my access back

Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
Fri Aug 12 10:46:25 BST 2011


On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:50:40AM +0200, Simon Poole wrote:
> Olaf
> 
> What you are suggesting would have amounted to allowing every single
> pre-CT mapper
> a veto on the license change process. With something around 300'000
> pre-CT mappers,
> this is obviously not just not practical, it is simply absurd.
> Nobody likes losing data and
> mappers, but it is unavoidable in a process involving so many people
> with so divergent
> views on the subject at hand.

Up to now the pre-CT mappers have not even asked if a license change
should happen at all, and WHICH license be switched to.

The OSMF has decided that it would be best to switch and the best
would be ODBL.

There has been no Mapper/Contributer participation up to now ...

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
„Für eine ausgewogene Energiepolitik über das Jahr 2020 hinaus ist die
Nutzung von Atomenergie eine Brückentechnologie und unverzichtbar. Ein
Ausstieg in zehn Jahren, wie noch unter der rot-grünen Regierung
beschlossen, kommt für die nationale Energieversorgung zu abrupt.“
Angela Merkel CDU 30.8.2009
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20110812/acfc9444/attachment.pgp>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list