[OSM-legal-talk] Anonymous nodes edited supporting way

[Pierre-Alain Dorange]

Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>
wrote:

> In order to preserve anonymity while still allowing them to be taken through
> into the new database, LWG has provided a list of the changesets edited by
> anonymous-but-accepting-CTs mappers. This is available on planet.osm.org and
> will be refreshed periodically. I believe both Frederik and Simon are using
> it for their visualisation/tally services.

OK, thanks to clarify thing.

But the nodes i'm talking about are indicate in geofabrick tool "subhect
to licence trouble" and i a explorer history for some nodes all users
envolve have accepted CTs, except for the first one that has no user in
history (i assume it was anonymous).

One node history :
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/21462322/history>

The area in geofabrick (nodes on the motorway)
<http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-0.55431&lat=45.75814&zoo
m=11&overlays=overview,wtfe_point_harmless,wtfe_line_harmless,wtfe_point
_modified,wtfe_line_modified_cp,wtfe_line_modified,wtfe_point_created,wt
fe_line_created_cp,wtfe_line_created>

Perhaps there is no problems, but i'm worry.

-- 
Pierre-Alain Dorange
OSM experiences : <http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/>