[OSM-legal-talk] instead of replacing data can I just revert to the last known "clean" version?

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 12/16/11 14:08, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> ,,, suddenly isn't that clear-cut anymore. Has user C really surveyed the
>> place, or has he maybe just run a bot that used complex rules to "fix"
>> names?
>
> Do we have any clear policy spelling out what constitutes "clean"?

No.

> Presumably there are some principles based on the "derived works"
> language in Creative Commons (IIRC...) But do we really know what a
> "derived work" for a single fact is?

No.

> Does the test "does not contain traces of non-CT-accepting users'
> work" hold up? How is "trace" defined? etc etc

What do you suggest we do?

Bye
Frederik