[OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

[ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen]

I think it's relevant that node changes as suggested
should involve stand alone nodes only (such as POI).

Once they are part of a structure of say a building or a road, water
or any area, the nodes should be considered a "composition"  rather
then 4 nodes.
While the underlying structure is a geographic fact, the choice
of place nodes and the number to represent the structure is
a creative work.

I think this seems an obvious conclusion, but should be made clear.



In addition the LWG should also pay some attention to relations.


Regards,

Gert 


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Richard Weait [mailto:richard at weait.com] 
Verzonden: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:44 AM
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier <jm at liotier.org>
wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 10:11 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
>>> Of particular interest are:
>>> - can node positions be cleaned by moving to a new position?
>
> While you are at it, I would love to hear about a specific subset of
the
> cases encompassed by this question : the cases where the edit is
> correlated with a change of source. I asked this question a week ago
in
> the "Are objects still tainted when they are edited from a better
source
> ?" thread here and it has not been answered yet.

And we're listening.  Tell us and be specific.  Some of us have been
remapping for a while.  Give examples.

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk