[OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other

[Anthony]

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Jonathan Harley <jon at spiffymap.net> wrote:
>> I've always understood that the intent of the
>> ODbL was not to change the spirit of OSM licensing, just to clarify it.
>
> Whose intent are we talking about, here?

Put another way, feel free to use the content of the people who chose
to relicense under the ODbL, as if CC-BY-SA were the ODbL.  But for
the content of those of us who have *not* chosen to relicense under
the ODbL, you need to respect that our intent was to release our work
under CC-BY-SA, and not the ODbL.