[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

[John Smith]

On 5 January 2011 03:03, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net> wrote:
> Actually it does not put the onus on OSMF to remove the data.  It says they
> "may" remove the data, it doesn't say they will remove the data, or even
> that they will make any attempt to remove it.  Indeed I'm sure it has been
> argued by others that putting the onus on OSMF to remove the data is placing
> "too high a burden" on OSMF.

Right, so the only way to avoid that for data with an attribution
requirement would be to limit future license changes to licenses that
at least have an attribution requirement.