[OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 01/05/2011 01:17 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
> If the new path for licence changes is well-thought-out and well-defined, why
> are we not using it now?

I would love to, however if today 2/3 agree to the license change, we 
still need to get an OK from the remaining 1/3 to continue using their 
data because they have not signed up to any CT that would allow us to do 
so even if they are in the minority. Also, there is no binding 
definition on who is an active contributor (and thus has a right to 
vote). So this procedure really is only possible *after* everyone has 
signed up.

Bye
Frederik