[OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open Government Licence

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 8 13:30:18 GMT 2011


On 8 January 2011 20:37, davespod <osmlists at dellams.fastmail.fm> wrote:
> If we assume that the reading of ODBL in the LWG minutes is correct, then
> ODBL would not require attribution of OSM's sources in produced works (e.g.,
> maps), rather only attribution of the OSM database.
>
> https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_87d3bmhxgc
> (see 5.c)

Richard has expressed an opinion that produced works must be attributed.

> Or am I missing something? (Probably.)

The proponents of ODBL can't even agree what it means, so what help is
there for the rest of us.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list