[OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes

John Smith deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 20:17:11 BST 2011


On 6 July 2011 02:49, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
<g.gremmen at cetest.nl> wrote:
> I doubt if any effort in re-creating a map database of the real world
> can be classified as creative work,
> as the mapper inevitably tries to copy reality to the best of his
> effort, and any deviation is just imperfection
> and corrected once the right information is available.

We aren't for the most part trying to make raster images of aerial
imagery, so there is a lot of creativity that goes into making
interpretations of the real world.

> I never met a OSM mapper saying he is using his creativity to create
> an original view of the world. Its not just a lack in precision and
> perfection that
> makes a work creative, the creator must also have the intention to add
> something
> of himself.

In terms of copyright this doesn't matter, just like if you write a
few lines of whatever, you automatically receive copyright on your
work.

> In creating tiles "the map" I agree. Not in creating a database.

In terms of copyright, it doesn't matter how a map is stored or how it
is displayed, it's the act of making it that matters and because there
is human involvement that's all that matters.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list