[OSM-legal-talk] Phase 4 and what it means

[John Smith]

On 5 June 2011 22:35, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> John Smith wrote:
>>
>> He is yet to back up his claims about people using the data
>
> I don't think it makes a difference. If I have one set of data with a
> questionable copyright situation and no street names, and another set of
> data with street names surveyed by someone who agrees to the CT, there's no
> reason to prefer the former.

He made the same claim to talk-au without backing up his assertions
when questions so his claims could be verified.