[OSM-legal-talk] Phase 4 and what it means

[SteveC]

Sadly I agree.

Steve

stevecoast.com

On Jun 5, 2011, at 4:19, Nick Hocking <nick.hocking at gmail.com> wrote:

> The problem I have is a bit different.
> 
> Someone (who has actively declined the CT) has been using nearmap to trace in some roads under construction in the Canberra area. Some of these roads are now complete and open to the public. 
> 
> It would be pointless of me to add information to the nearmapped ways (E.G it's name) since it seems certain that these ways will be deleted from OSM. However it is critical that these roads appear on the map right now, so that emergency services have access to the most up-to-date information available.
> 
> The only way, I see, out of this mess is for me to map a new set of residential roads, using my actual GPS tracks, alongside the nearmapped ones, make then properly routable, and maybe put a layer tag on them (for the moment) to ensure that routers don't confuse the issue.
> Once all the nearmap data has been removed then I would remove the layer tags.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20110605/9cc86543/attachment.html>