[OSM-legal-talk] CTs are not full copyright assignment
Robert Kaiser
kairo at kairo.at
Tue Jun 7 16:36:03 BST 2011
Ed Avis schrieb:
> Frederik Ramm<frederik at ...> writes:
>
>> 3. OSMF to choose a new license that is "free and open", present it to
>> OSM community for vote, and get 2/3 of active mappers to agree with the
>> new license. This is the only bit that is new, and the "2/3 of mappers"
>> hurdle can hardly be called "allow the board to tweak the license".
>
> The process is pretty simple really:
>
> - decide what licence you want without bothering to hold a vote
>
> - get everyone to sign up to new contributor terms allowing that licence
>
> - block anyone who says no from contributing
>
> and presto! you have your 2/3 majority of active contributors.
That only works as long as there are no CTs the people have agreed to
and that define a different process...
Robert Kaiser
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list