[OSM-legal-talk] Private negotiations

[Jim Brown]

Let's be clear that Cloudmade have not been in any private discussions, nor made any demands of OSMF or the lwg.

We support odbl and I think most (if not all) of us have accepted the new cts.

I'd be curious where this came from.

Jim Brown -CTO CloudMade

(Sent from my iPhone)
+44 7595 367 664

On 8 Jun 2011, at 10:49, "Quintin Driver" <quentindriver92 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Richard, have you or any of the LWG members done any work for MapQuest, Skobbler and / or Cloudmade ?
> 
> --
> I'm led to believe that people have been issuing LWG with private lists of demands that they want met before they will consent to ODbL+CT. 
> 
> Could I ask that said people have the courtesy to post their demands here, too? It would be a shame if the suspicion arose that the process is being swayed by closed demands. LWG does of course publish minutes, as is right and proper, but there is currently no requirement for those writing to it to disclose their own demands. 
> 
> cheers 
> Richard 
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk