[OSM-legal-talk] CTs are not full copyright assignment
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer
olaf at amen-online.de
Fri Jun 17 14:07:35 BST 2011
Hi Dermot,
> That's not a bad start - but if I play spot-the-missing-bit, it looks
> to me that you aren't prepared to trust 2/3 of the community to decide
> that (for reasons not yet forseen) a licence other than the two you
> list and which may not be copyleft/sharealike.
Please note that the CT do not guarantee a 2/3 majority of the community. Only
a part of the community is entitled to vote.
I would also like to repeat what I wrote in an earlier email to this list:
"The process of updating the CT and of responding to criticism
within the community is far more important to me than the actual result of
this update."
Shortly after I wrote these words, a respected community member attacked me as
being "blinded by ideology". He never apologised, and no one contradicted him.
This personal attack is the main reason why I am now completely unwilling to
accept the CT as long as I see peoblems in it.
Olaf
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list