[OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

[ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen]

>Not sure of you point, since cc-by-sa can't be magically turned into
>ODBL data, it can only stay cc-by-sa.

If you are legally sure and prove that they were cc-by-sa in the first
place. ;<))
This copyright stuff for soft - ware (not software) is a can of worms
that will
kill the project in the end.
This discussion is turning completely silly.
What if Betty changes country and decides to reside in France -before-
publicating
her tiles on a server located in the Bahama's   and claiming CC0
;<)))))

Gert


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com] 
Verzonden: zaterdag 18 juni 2011 12:36
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com
regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

On 18 June 2011 20:26, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> Is this similar?:
>
> Andy, in Australia, contributes CC-By or CC-By-SA data to CC-By-SA
> OpenStreetMap.  Perhaps the data is Australian boundaries or
> something.
> Betty, in UK, creates CC-By-SA tiles that include that boundary data.
> Chuck, in USA, creates vectors from those tiles and later contributes
> them to OSM under CC-By-SA and CT/ODbL.
>
> All fair here?  How would it change if Betty were in USA as well?

Not sure of you point, since cc-by-sa can't be magically turned into
ODBL data, it can only stay cc-by-sa.

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk