[OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

[ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen]

+1 anyway

I just wanted to make clear that our current data
is submitted under CC-BY-SA (at least our community members declares so)
but there is absolutely no prove that the data submitted
can be CC-BY-SA.

I just want to say that copyright is not just something you
can declare or deny in ordinary mapmaking, let alone
once is becomes a database and/or mixed with times.

The discussions on this list become theoretically beyond a level
an ordinary lawyer can understand, let-alone us.

Gert

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com] 
Verzonden: zondag 19 juni 2011 6:59
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com
regarding submission of derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap

On 19 June 2011 03:40, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
<g.gremmen at cetest.nl> wrote:
> What if Betty changes country and decides to reside in France -before-
> publicating
> her tiles on a server located in the Bahama's   and claiming CC0
> ;<)))))

It's silly because some people injected a silly argument into it, but
it would seem that ODBL opens up some pretty big loop holes that
CC-by-SA doesn't, and we've been told time after time about how much
better it is, CC-by-SA is working just fine, but ODBL won't.

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk