[OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open Data License/Community Guidelines for temporary file
David Groom
reviews at pacific-rim.net
Wed Jun 22 15:44:52 BST 2011
----- Original Message -----
From: "ThomasB" <toba0211 at yahoo.de>
To: <legal-talk at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open Data License/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
>
>
> David Groom wrote:
>>
>> As far as I can see, ignoring your specific example, and genearlising,
>> the
>> "unwanted implication" of your clarification above would be that as long
>> as
>> someone deleted the derivate database they had created they could then
>> claim
>> it was "temporary" and therefore sidestep the requirements of the ODbL to
>> distribute it. To avoid this you would thenhave to start defining
>> "temporary" etc.
>>
>
> Thanks David. Good point. I think the intention is to avoid that someone
> mix
> OSM with proprietary data and makes a produced work out of it without
> sharing the proprietary data.
> So let me rephrase it and restrict a bit more
>
> /"Temporary software generated files used for the generation of a Produced
> Work or a Derivative Database that
> i) contain data from OSM,
> ii) may contain data from other sources that are
> a) free and open licensed /(hope there is a definition for that
> anywhere)/
> and
> b) publicly available
> iii) do not contain any proprietary data
> iii) are only created and used for the purpose of the generation of one
> Produced Work or one Derivative Database,
> iv) will not be used for any purpose thereafter,
> v) will not be distributed or made publicly available
> do not constitute a derivative database, collective database or produced
> work"
> /
I think that the above wording has the same implications as the points I
have summarised on my latest post to this list with the subject line "When
goes a 'community guideline' change rather than explain a licence".
Incidentally my post was not written in response to your earlier post, it
was a query I already had, but it may indicate the timeliness of my post.
David
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Exception-in-Open-Data-License-Community-Guidelines-for-temporary-file-tp6504201p6504373.html
> Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
>
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list