[OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open Data License/Community Guidelines for temporary file

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Wed Jun 22 18:29:02 BST 2011


Hi,

On 06/22/11 15:18, ThomasB wrote:
> My point is that a user of software, and this is not limited to Garmin map
> software, may not know what a software does in the background i.e. if it is
> creating a (temporary) Derivative Database, a Collective Database or
> whatever.

Yes. The software might well be proprietary, and so the user would not 
have a chance to really know.

In today's operating systems, whether something is in a file or in 
memory is a boundary that might easily get blurred. It would be kind of 
strange if one algorithm that chooses to build a giant data structure in 
memory (using, for example, a lot of swap space) would be treated 
differently from another algorithm that does exactly the same, but 
writes its data out to a temporary file (which might be a database).

I think that your attempt at solving this problem is a bit complicated 
but I don't have a brilliant idea either. We might just have to live 
with the fact that the same end product, created using different paths, 
may result in different ODbL requirements.

Bye
Frederik




More information about the legal-talk mailing list