[OSM-legal-talk] Effect of Remapping on Contributor TermsAcceptance (Numbers!)

[Simon Poole]

The numbers -only- show the effect of remapping, currently the far 
larger effect is acceptance of the CTs by mappers who haven't done that 
up to now. Around 0.1 to 0.2 % per month (depending on the object 
category). In other words, using just as silly extrapolations as you do, 
we would have 100% of everything anyway in roughly two years if we 
simply just let things carry on as they are now (which is not the 
intention).

Simon

Am 24.09.2011 16:29, schrieb ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen:
>
> <irony ON>
>
> It seems as if the community is not that motivated
>
> to re-map  all those evil CC-BY-SA data  that
>
> sneeked into into the future OdBL fork.
>
> In this pace we need more then 7 years to fix it.
>
> Common CT-OSM members, start mapping all
>
> that misleading non-CT data ! Someone
>
> may use it in a routeplanner and drive
>
> by accident  into a CC-BY-SA road, and
>
> who knows what happens then.
>
> <irony OFF>
>
> Gert
>
> *Van:*Simon Poole [mailto:simon at poole.ch]
> *Verzonden:* Saturday, September 24, 2011 8:56 AM
> *Aan:* Licensing and other legal discussions.
> *Onderwerp:* [OSM-legal-talk] Affect of Remapping on Contributor 
> TermsAcceptance (Numbers!)
>
>
> [Apologies in advance for the HTML formatting]
>
> As you may have noticed, the sysadmins were kind enough to generate a 
> new full history dump over the last couple of days. Besides generating 
> new numbers for odbl.poole.ch (which will take some time for the full 
> set), I was mainly interested in seeing how large the effect of 
> (intentional or not) remapping has been over the last three months.
>
> As can be seen from the following numbers, while the effect is not 
> particularly large (nobody has really called for aggressive remapping 
> yet) it is quite noticeable.
>
> SImon
>
>
> 	
>
> No
>
> 	
> 	
> 	
>
> Unknown
>
> 	
> 	
> 	
>
> *Total Diff*
>
> 	
>
> 	
>
> 2011-06-19
>
> 	
>
> 2011-09-19
>
> 	
>
> Diff
>
> 	
>
> 2011-06-19
>
> 	
>
> 2011-09-19
>
> 	
>
> Diff
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Nodes
>
> 	
>
> 32'505'411
>
> 	
>
> 32'296'893
>
> 	
>
> -208'518
>
> 	
>
> 25'315'574
>
> 	
>
> 23'618'704
>
> 	
>
> -1'696'870
>
> 	
>
> -1'905'388
>
> 	
>
> -3.30 %
>
> Highways
>
> 	
>
> 777'070
>
> 	
>
> 764'439
>
> 	
>
> -12'631
>
> 	
>
> 1'703'211
>
> 	
>
> 1'668'481
>
> 	
>
> -34'730
>
> 	
>
> -47'361
>
> 	
>
> -1.91 %
>
> Other Ways
>
> 	
>
> 1'245'547
>
> 	
>
> 1'233'705
>
> 	
>
> -11'842
>
> 	
>
> 702'679
>
> 	
>
> 659'473
>
> 	
>
> -43'206
>
> 	
>
> -55'048
>
> 	
>
> -2.83 %
>
> Routes
>
> 	
>
> 4'208
>
> 	
>
> 4'047
>
> 	
>
> -161
>
> 	
>
> 3'112
>
> 	
>
> 3'078
>
> 	
>
> -34
>
> 	
>
> -195
>
> 	
>
> -2.66 %
>
> Other Relations
>
> 	
>
> 45'957
>
> 	
>
> 45'635
>
> 	
>
> -322
>
> 	
>
> 10'007
>
> 	
>
> 9'724
>
> 	
>
> -284
>
> 	
>
> -606
>
> 	
>
> -1.08 %
>
> Mappers
>
> 	
>
> 288
>
> 	
>
> 287
>
> 	
>
> -1
>
> 	
>
> 59'905
>
> 	
>
> 59'339
>
> 	
>
> -566
>
> 	
>
> -567
>
> 	
>
> -0.94 %
>
>
>
> Note: both set of numbers (from the 19th of June and the 19th of 
> September) use the same licensing state data from the 22nd of 
> September. The "Mappers" row reflect the change in the number of 
> mappers that created objects that are still visible in the database.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20110924/ef4a452f/attachment-0001.html>