[OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-cz] czech republic: data wrongly marked as ODbL compatible was Re: Hromadné importy & změna licence

["Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"]

Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
>  
> There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
>  
> a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
> okay for those.
>  
> b) ODbL compatible - mass imports. CT+ODbL is okay for those, provided
> data from a) are kept. Richard convinced me that CT is not meant to be
> evil, and I can live with that.
>  
> c) ODbL incompatible mass imports. Obviously these need to be
> removed. I have no power to change this. Mass imports were cities 
> from wikipedia (place=*) and railway stations from around
> 
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/188101
> 187327
> 
> I hope this helps, and I'd like to see some reply, thanks,
> 
> 									Pavel

Hi,

I admit that I'm pretty confused right now... Are you saying that you've
changed your mind and are willing to agree to ODbL+CT, except for the
changesets containing imports of incompatible data? That would be really
great!

If this is that case, I personally volunteer to help track down your
changesets containing the incompatible imports.
The only two are the wikipedia imports of places and railway stations,
is this correct?

Best regards,
Petr Morávek aka Xificurk

PS: I've added to CC rebuild@ as well, just to let the guys there know
that there could be a last-minute request for keeping most of the data
from Pavel. Sorry, to all that will get this mail multiple times.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20120402/cfb77dd3/attachment.pgp>