[OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-dk] åben offentlig licens og OSM, part 2

Michael Collinson mike at ayeltd.biz
Fri Apr 20 16:20:30 BST 2012


On 20/04/2012 13:23, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
[preamble cut]
> Hi,
>
> I wonder about these two requirements in the license[1], and whether 
> or not they could present a problem:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - sikrer, at udnyttelsen af materialet sker på en måde, som ikke kan 
> give indtryk af at have officiel status eller at være støttet eller 
> godkendt af licensgiver.
>
> - sikrer, at udnyttelsen af materialet ikke vildleder eller giver et 
> misvisende billede af materialet eller materialets kilde.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Translation (by Google, very slightly tweaked by me):
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Ensure that the utilization of the material occurs in a manner that 
> does not give the impression of having official status or to be 
> endorsed or approved by the licensor.
>
> - Ensure that the utilization of the material does not mislead or give 
> a misleading picture of the material or material source.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [1] 
> <http://digitaliser.dk/resource/600558/artefact/Den+%c3%a5bne+offentlige+licens.pdf> 
>

I believe that both can be can be met in our attribution of the licensor 
on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution

"OpenStreetMap's utilization of this material does not imply any 
official status nor endorsement or approval by XXXX. You can find out 
more about XXXX and this material at http:\\xxxxxsite.dk"

A short description may also help as would be a link to a wiki project 
page describing the data and how we are using it.  I think the current 
attribution we give the UK Ordnance Survey would satisfy both requirements:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution#UK:_Ordnance_Survey_.28OpenData.E2.84.A2.29

I think this is a really nice license and hope it is more widely adopted 
by governmental agencies.

Mike



More information about the legal-talk mailing list