[OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-dk] åben offentlig licens og OSM, part 2
Michael Collinson
mike at ayeltd.biz
Fri Apr 20 16:20:30 BST 2012
On 20/04/2012 13:23, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
[preamble cut]
> Hi,
>
> I wonder about these two requirements in the license[1], and whether
> or not they could present a problem:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - sikrer, at udnyttelsen af materialet sker på en måde, som ikke kan
> give indtryk af at have officiel status eller at være støttet eller
> godkendt af licensgiver.
>
> - sikrer, at udnyttelsen af materialet ikke vildleder eller giver et
> misvisende billede af materialet eller materialets kilde.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Translation (by Google, very slightly tweaked by me):
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Ensure that the utilization of the material occurs in a manner that
> does not give the impression of having official status or to be
> endorsed or approved by the licensor.
>
> - Ensure that the utilization of the material does not mislead or give
> a misleading picture of the material or material source.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [1]
> <http://digitaliser.dk/resource/600558/artefact/Den+%c3%a5bne+offentlige+licens.pdf>
>
I believe that both can be can be met in our attribution of the licensor
on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution
"OpenStreetMap's utilization of this material does not imply any
official status nor endorsement or approval by XXXX. You can find out
more about XXXX and this material at http:\\xxxxxsite.dk"
A short description may also help as would be a link to a wiki project
page describing the data and how we are using it. I think the current
attribution we give the UK Ordnance Survey would satisfy both requirements:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution#UK:_Ordnance_Survey_.28OpenData.E2.84.A2.29
I think this is a really nice license and hope it is more widely adopted
by governmental agencies.
Mike
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list