[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Contact And Remap Campaign

[Simon Poole]

On the same topic:

I've started work on going over the import catalogue (giving a lot of 
room for stuff that is under  discussion or clearly ok (Corine)) and 
moving entries that either will or should go away with the licence 
transition (note green is -good- aka will be automatically deleted), 
and/or are not documented well enough to keep in the database and should 
be deleted after investigation.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue#Imports_slated_for_deletion

As said above, the list isn't complete yet and probably contains a 
couple of false positives (stuff imported by GeoFabrik for example).

Simon

Am 13.02.2012 15:51, schrieb Richard Weait:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Simon Poole<simon at poole.ch>  wrote:
>> Well essentially CC-by only imposes attribution so it is doable.
>>
>> But in any case: is the import listed in the import catalogue?
>>
>> If not, I would respectfully ask the DWG to summarily delete the data (the
>> "enforce" bit of my previous posting).
> I think you mean, "respectfully request that the errant importer clean
> up their own mess."  The DWG can be polled for help, but the community
> should attempt to resolve this first.
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk