[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL implementation plan - extra phase proposal

Mike N niceman at att.net
Sat Jan 28 16:45:10 GMT 2012


On 1/28/2012 8:30 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> There is nothing fundamentally wrong or impossible about that.
>
> But it does introduce more work for us (because we would have to
> implement a way for the API to reject changes to tainted objects).

   A notice could originate in the 2 most popular editors, and not 
require an API change.   The user would at least be aware of the problem 
before continuing the edit.



More information about the legal-talk mailing list