[OSM-legal-talk] Triggering ShareAlike in Government

[Kate Chapman]

Hi Pekka,

I'm concerned specifically about the specifics of the licensing so I
can speak to them, not the ideal situation.  Yes when I present I do
approach with explaining it is best if everyone contributes to the
same map.

I still need to know the specifics of the constraints of the license,
since I often get asked questions.

-Kate

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Pekka Sarkola <pekka.sarkola at gispo.fi> wrote:
> Kate,
>
> Can you reverse this: how about if NMA will improve local OSM data and then
> MoE will use OpenStreetMap. Benefits for all, right?
>
> That is how we try to make it here in Finland. Well, National Land Survey of
> Finland is not improving OSM, but we (as OSMers) can improve OSM with their
> data.
>
> Rgs,
>
> Pekka
>
> ---- Pekka Sarkola – pekka.sarkola at gispo.fi – www.gispo.fi ----
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kate Chapman [mailto:kate at maploser.com]
> Sent: 18. kesäkuuta 2012 6:59
> To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
> Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Triggering ShareAlike in Government
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a question about what would trigger the ShareAlike in the context of
> government. Let's say for example a National Mapping Agency takes the
> OpenStreetMap road data for their area and then improves upon it. Those
> improvements are shared with the Ministry of the Environment. Is that
> redistribution?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Kate
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk