[OSM-legal-talk] License Working Group 2013
jeff at gwhat.org
Tue Jan 22 19:34:23 GMT 2013
Would this be an appropriate forum to discuss whether or own slippy map
requires our own copyright mark?
The response to this question in a separate thread on this list has been
vague and non-definitive.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Michael Collinson <mike at ayeltd.biz> wrote:
> The LWG will hold its first post-license change meeting provisionally
> Tuesday 22nd January at 18:00 GMT/UTC.
> I would like to draw your attention to the following:
> We'll be discussing our future role and any input on that, preferably to
> this list, is most welcome. We've started putting together a remit
> document here:
> We welcome new members and diverse views. If you are interested in opening
> up geospatial data and imagery for anyone to use, please join us. You can
> contact me at my email address if you want more details or you can join us
> for one meeting to see if you like it.
> If you cannot or do not want to join us long term but have a particular
> issue that is important to you and it is in the best interests of OSM, we
> can make it a project and you can join us for one meeting or a few weeks.
> In the UK, example projects might be freeing up postcodes or public right
> of way route definitions. Do you have important issues in your country?
> Are you an organisation that is finding OSM data difficult to use for legal
> Michael Collinson
> Chair, License Working Group
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
Global World History Atlas
jeff at gwhat.org
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer> osm: Historical
/ my OSM user page <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer>
t: @GWHAThistory <https://twitter.com/GWHAThistory>
f: GWHAThistory <https://www.facebook.com/GWHAThistory>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the legal-talk