[OSM-legal-talk] "Information for officials and diplomats of countries and entities with disputed territories"

[Simon Poole]

Sorry for missing the meeting got my times confused, It is a definite
yes from me. There is a "term" in singular that should be plural I
believe. But otherwise completely ok with me.

Simon

Am 09.07.2013 20:38, schrieb Michael Collinson:
> Simon,
>
> Oliver, Dermot and I have give a finally look over the document and
> are happy to now send it to the board as our formal proposal. However,
> as Chair I would really prefer a formal quorate, 4, for such things
> and ask you to indicate yes or no by email before I send it.
>
> https://docs.google.com/a/osmfoundation.org/document/d/1uQ0hpkFxqdNf7aPMk_5PaHFZojxULMcWXxLJRbYq4oE/edit
>
> The draft is of the last meeting + your changes + we went through and
> considered and clarified what each "OpenStreetMap" meant.  As an
> interesting aside, it defines "OpenStreetMap" without qualification to
> be the database itself rather than any human entity ... may be a
> useful legal construct in the future.
>
> I also intend forwarding it to the Japanese community since treatment
> of disputed-island naming is an issue there as it ties the hands of
> the national mapping agency on how cooperative they can be with us. If
> I get any substantial feedback, I will forward to board.
>
> Mike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20130709/5a26fd61/attachment.html>