[OSM-legal-talk] "Information for officials and diplomats of countries and entities with disputed territories"
simon at poole.ch
Tue Jul 9 19:56:01 UTC 2013
Sorry for missing the meeting got my times confused, It is a definite
yes from me. There is a "term" in singular that should be plural I
believe. But otherwise completely ok with me.
Am 09.07.2013 20:38, schrieb Michael Collinson:
> Oliver, Dermot and I have give a finally look over the document and
> are happy to now send it to the board as our formal proposal. However,
> as Chair I would really prefer a formal quorate, 4, for such things
> and ask you to indicate yes or no by email before I send it.
> The draft is of the last meeting + your changes + we went through and
> considered and clarified what each "OpenStreetMap" meant. As an
> interesting aside, it defines "OpenStreetMap" without qualification to
> be the database itself rather than any human entity ... may be a
> useful legal construct in the future.
> I also intend forwarding it to the Japanese community since treatment
> of disputed-island naming is an issue there as it ties the hands of
> the national mapping agency on how cooperative they can be with us. If
> I get any substantial feedback, I will forward to board.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the legal-talk