[OSM-legal-talk] License question, user clicking on map

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Mon Mar 4 12:46:40 UTC 2013

Am 04.03.2013 13:39, schrieb Jonathan Harley:
> On 04/03/13 11:53, Pieren wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Harley <jon at spiffymap.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Personally, I think this does leave a loophole where you could reverse
>>> engineer OSM's data from imagery, but as I said at the time, I'm not
>>> worried
>>> about it because so much accuracy would be lost. In any case,
>> Technically, it is possible to export in a format where accuracy is
>> 100% preserved, e.g. any vectorized format like PDF or SVG. If you
>> export all tags in a concatenated text string, your map is maybe not
>> readable for humans but you could in this way rebuild the full
>> database under a new license...
> That was touched on last time round, yes. Giving someone a
> vector-format image might count as conveying a database. I think it's
> ambiguous.
> The ODbL essentially treats images and databases as though one thing
> can never be both. It's another thing that could usefully be clarified
> in a future version, IMO.
There is legal precedent that a map can be both an image (on paper) and
a database (don't forget that we are not discussing databases in a
technical sense). In the end if something like this went to court it is
likely that it would be judged on the intent, not on technicalities.


More information about the legal-talk mailing list