[OSM-legal-talk] Attribution

Steve Coast steve at asklater.com
Mon Apr 28 19:46:10 UTC 2014

On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Jake Wasserman <jwasserman at gmail.com> wrote:
>  Let's just not pretend the requirements are "simple", "tiny", or "little", but are instead complex and sweeping.
My comparison was to proprietary vendors. Have you ever read one of their contracts?

> In any case, I agree with the larger point that OSM data users must comply with the rules as they exist and we should publicly call out their violations.

Good :-)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20140428/4feb1e96/attachment.html>

More information about the legal-talk mailing list