[OSM-legal-talk] YouTube videos

Van Exel, Martijn martijnv at telenav.com
Fri Aug 8 17:35:37 UTC 2014

Thanks for clarifying, I glossed over the implications of the attribution
requirement a little too easily.

On 8/8/14, 2:48 AM, "Simon Poole" <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

>Am 05.08.2014 20:25, schrieb Martijn van Exel:
>> Note that YouTube users can also choose a CC-BY license - which should
>> be compatible with ODbL. But the default is the Standard YouTube License
>> outlined above.
>CC-BY is not per se compatible. We need (and I believe this is still the
>case with 4.0) explicit acknowledgement that the way that we provide
>attribution is OK and that we do not provide downstream attribution for
>individual sources. In the past it has been reasonably easy to get that
>from institutional sources, but it does imply adding the source to our
>contributors list etc. something that we would likely want to avoid in
>the 1000s.

More information about the legal-talk mailing list