[OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal

Alex Barth alex at mapbox.com
Wed Jul 30 14:44:59 UTC 2014


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:

> Am 28/lug/2014 um 09:07 schrieb Alex Barth <alex at mapbox.com>:
>
> Our lawyers' advice is captured in the guideline as shared and posted in
> this revision:
>
>
>
> your lawyers did really say according to their understanding a pair of
> coordinates is similar to an image or a video, hence a "work"?
>

Yeah, there's no definition of 'work' in the ODbL, just a non-exclusive
list of examples in the definition of Produced Work.

> “Produced Work” – a work (such as an image, audiovisual material, text,
or sounds) resulting from using the whole or a Substantial part of the
Contents (via a search or other query) from this Database, a Derivative
Database, or this Database as part of a Collective Database. - See more at:
http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/#sthash.JPKZj3yo.dpuf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20140730/27f2eae8/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list