[OSM-legal-talk] Contents Licence for OSM Data

[Alex Barth]

On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:

> > We have no significant third party ODbL data releases due to OSM
> > share alike to show for,
>
> Then clearly OMS should have stuck with BY-SA for the database, as
> that did gain third party data releases.


Did it? I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, no matter whether I
read this line literally or ironically. Or are you trolling me :) ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20141103/4cf4fbe8/attachment.html>