[OSM-legal-talk] Updated geocoding community guideline proposal

[Simon Poole]

Am 20.02.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Simon Poole:
...
> 
> Treating the geocoded results plus input data as a derivative DB
> sidesteps various issues. 
...

I should have mentioned that the single biggest advantage is that it
doesn't require us to supply a definition of what "geocoding" actually
is. Trying to nail that down in a general and future proof way has been
one of the larger roadblocks. Just imagine when OSM doesn't just have
address data for everything, but it is attached to the corresponding
entrance of office (indoor mapping).

Simon

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20150220/7f075f4c/attachment.sig>