[OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM

[Simon Poole]

Am 13.05.2015 um 22:00 schrieb Tom Lee:
..
> 
>     Nope. I was referring to collective databases in the ODbL which are
>     roughly the equivalent of collective works in early versions of CC
>     licenses and only require the OSM derived part to be subject to the ODbL
>     terms.
> 
> 
> This is the part I think I could use help understanding. My impression
> is that a collective database can contain ODbL and non-ODbL content
> side-by-side. Are you saying that CC-BY 4.0 makes this impossible
> because its attribution requirements would attach to the non-ODbL
> content as well?
--

Roughly yes. Though my concern is not mainly about the requirement
itself, it is simply that the concept of a collective database seems to
be incompatible with the current text of CC by 4.0.

Now I know how I would weasel myself out of this if I was CC, but I'm
not, so lets see what they say.

Simon

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20150513/e39cb8e0/attachment.sig>