[OSM-legal-talk] Proposed Collective Database Guideline (was Meta-Data Guideline)
Christoph Hormann
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Thu Nov 5 10:50:55 UTC 2015
On Thursday 05 November 2015, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> The text can be found here
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collective_Database_Guideline
Looks good. Two observations:
- The second example could possibly use clarification that it applies
when road classification is solely based on traffic data and not if it
is a compound rating based on traffic data and OSM road classes. In
principle this is clear but emphasizing the boundary between collective
and derivative here might help.
- You now point out the possibility to use this guideline in combination
with regional cuts by referring to 'a regional cut'. This is good but
reminds me that the regional cuts guideline could use some
clarification. Right now it allows an arbitrary number of cuts as long
as they meet a somewhat fuzzy size criterion. This is essentially not
well suited for the declared purpose to avoid cherry-picking.
I still think the blanket permission to selectively replace individual
attributes with proprietary data is questionable. It might be
difficult to exploit this in a way that harms OSM on a larger scale but
there is a clear risk here IMO. I admit it is difficult to draw a
different line that is generally understandable, universally applicable
and objective.
I especially see this as a problem in areas where 'big data' techniques
are going to allow more consistent, reliable and up-to-date assessment
of certain properties for certain applications than manual assessment.
OSM of course deliberately focusses on manual data acquisition and this
is something that will always be important but in quite a few areas of
application i see the difference in practical value between this data
alone and after supplementing it with automatically acquired data is
rapidly increasing and the OSM community (and of course also the larger
open data community) needs to ask itself if it wants to leave this
whole field to proprietary data providers.
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list