[OSM-legal-talk] question regarding produced work

[Simon Poole]

Lars, is there any indication that the site uses for the map anything
else than existing OSM data?

Note that we do not require trivial transformations of OSM data to be
published as long as the original data is available (for very obvious
reasons). See
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Trivial_Transformations_-_Guideline


Simon

Am 16.11.2015 um 12:25 schrieb Lars-Daniel Weber:
> Dear Ladies and Gentlemen!
>
> The website "http://öpnvkarte.de/" is based on OpenStreetMap data, licensed under ODbL. It shows produced work (rendered tile images, style licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0) as defined in section 1.0 of ODbL.
>
> Since there is a Publicly Use of a Derivative Database, the author should release a machine readable form of data, as described in section 4.6. Upon request, the author didn't answer several requests by several people.
>
> What's next correct step to do? Shall I contact the provider of the OSM database and inform him about the user? I think, there are some steps described in section 9.
>
> Sincere regards,
> Lars-Daniel Weber
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20151116/da78fe93/attachment.sig>