[OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

[Simon Poole]

I've added a clarification to the example in question as it is causing
some contention.

Simon

Am 22.09.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
> Am 22.09.2015 um 22:14 schrieb alyssa wright:
>> What does this mean? "uses ratings from OSM " 
>>
> Again: it is just a hypothetical example.
>
> Obviously using a real life use case and declaring that as
> non-conformant or whatever in a not yet agreed to guideline would not be
> sensible (just imagine the outrage).
>
> Not to mention the ability of the OSM community to dig out many years
> stale and obviously out of date wiki pages and to pretend that they are
> meaningful implies that anything that we put in writing is going to be
> quoted for the next couple of decades regardless of what guideline we
> end up with eventually.
>
> Simon
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20150922/e25226f4/attachment.sig>