[OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Tue Sep 22 21:15:44 UTC 2015
Hi,
this is not the right group to discuss the matter but let me just say
that your statement
On 09/22/2015 10:57 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> It's dismaying to see the landscape fractured. I would like OSM to become a better legal
> home (or at least partner) for all geodata, including new datasets like
> LIDAR, traffic and street-level imagery.
is certainly not universally held in OSM, and that
> Those projects are going
> elsewhere right now.
is a welcome effect, rather than a shortcoming of OSM, for those who see
OSM as a project of makers rather than a receptacle for other people's
geodata.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list