[OSM-legal-talk] Proposed "Metadata"-Guideline

Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org
Tue Sep 22 21:15:44 UTC 2015


Hi,

   this is not the right group to discuss the matter but let me just say
that your statement

On 09/22/2015 10:57 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> It's dismaying to see the landscape fractured. I would like OSM to become a better legal
> home (or at least partner) for all geodata, including new datasets like
> LIDAR, traffic and street-level imagery. 

is certainly not universally held in OSM, and that

> Those projects are going
> elsewhere right now.

is a welcome effect, rather than a shortcoming of OSM, for those who see
OSM as a project of makers rather than a receptacle for other people's
geodata.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"



More information about the legal-talk mailing list