[OSM-legal-talk] When should ODbL apply to geocoding
penorman at mac.com
Tue Sep 22 23:38:48 UTC 2015
I'm trimming the cc list and taking this to a new thread, since it's
independent of the metadata guideline.
On 9/22/2015 4:26 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
> Overall, I'd love to see us moving towards a share alike
> interpretation that applies to "OSM as the map" and allows for liberal
> intermingling of narrower data extracts. In plain terms: to
> specifically _not_ extend the ODbL via share alike to third party data
> elements intermingled with OSM data elements of the same kind. E. g.
> mixing OSM and non-OSM addresses should not extend ODbL to non-OSM
> addresses, mixing OSM and non-OSM POIs should not extend the ODbL to
> non-OSM POIs and so forth.
Turning this around, when do you think share-alike should apply in a
More information about the legal-talk