[OSM-legal-talk] MAPS.ME combining OSM data and non-OSM data?

[Johan C]

It's quite simple: as long as MAPS.ME operates in either the white or the
grey area of the license it's perfectly fine what they are doing.

Op 22 jul. 2016 12:04 p.m. schreef "Richard Fairhurst" <richard at systemed.net
>:

> Ilya Zverev wrote:
> > Let's consider another use case. An application that shows OSM map,
> > and on top of it shows 1 mln of user points. A users has an option to
> > hide the OSM map underneath proprietary points, with a radius of 1
> > km. Does in that moment when a user clickes the options, the
> > combined map become derivative?
>
> The question then would be how ODbL treats a machine-generated result like
> that, where both independent datasets are transmitted to the device but the
> selection/arrangement of the "combined" result is done algorithmically
> on-device.
>
> That probably depends on your reading of the terms "Convey", "Use" and
> "Publicly" in ODbL; I confess to not being 100% sure how they would apply
> in
> such a case, and would be interested to hear others' opinions.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-MAPS-ME-combining-OSM-data-and-non-OSM-data-tp5877650p5878889.html
> Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20160722/dd79d872/attachment.html>